Revocable vs. Irrevocable Trusts

A living trust can be revocable or irrevocable, says Yahoo Finance’s recent article entitled “Revocable vs. Irrevocable Trusts: Which Is Better?” It is certainly true that not everyone needs a trust, and there are many different types of trusts you can establish. But, when considering a trust, clients need to consider the pros and cons of revocable versus irrevocable trusts.

Revocable Trust

A revocable trust is a trust that can be changed or terminated at any time during the lifetime of the trustor (i.e., the person making the trust). This means you could:

  • Add or remove beneficiaries at any time
  • Transfer new assets into the trust or remove ones that are in it
  • Change the terms of the trust concerning how assets should be managed or distributed to beneficiaries; and
  • Terminate or end the trust completely.

When you die, a revocable trust automatically becomes irrevocable and no further changes can be made to its terms.

The big advantage of choosing a revocable trust is flexibility. A revocable trust allows you to make changes and to grow with your needs. Revocable trusts can also allow your beneficiaries to avoid probate when you die.  Most clients use revocable trusts during their lifetimes, although they might establish irrevocable trusts for other people or to address specific circumstances.

However, a revocable trust doesn’t offer the same type of protection against creditors as an irrevocable trust. If you’re sued, creditors could still try to attach trust assets to satisfy a judgment. The assets in a revocable trust are part of your taxable estate and subject to federal estate taxes when you die, which is usually a good thing, but in some assets isn’t sufficient tax planning.  It also provides no advance asset protection for Medicaid.

Irrevocable Trust

An irrevocable trust is permanent. If you create an irrevocable trust during your lifetime, any assets you transfer to the trust stay in the trust. You can’t add or remove beneficiaries or change the terms of the trust.

Irrevocable trusts are commonly used for creditor protection or tax planning.  There are times, such as when considering long-term care Medicaid in a nursing home, or reducing the size of your estate for estate tax purposes, that you want the asset not in your name and out of your personal control.  The irrevocable trust can achieve that by having the trustee own it instead of you.

Irrevocable trusts created during your lifetime are often done in addition to a revocable trust so that you achieve the particular benefits of an irrevocable trust only for that property which needs the advantage.

Irrevocable trusts are more commonly something you set up to be effective at your death.  We’ve written extensively on this, but it is extremely common to leave your children’s inheritance to them in irrevocable trusts that set the rules by which they benefit from the trust and provide creditor and divorce protection to the beneficiary.  This also works with spendthrift beneficiaries and similar trusts are used when a beneficiary has a disability and is using government benefits.

See here for more:  https://galligan-law.com/how-do-trusts-work-in-your-estate-plan/  

It is worth noting that irrevocable trusts, despite their name, sometimes can be revoked, changed or you can remove property from them.

For example, irrevocable trusts might have a power of substitution allowing you to take out property as long as you put equal value property back in.  Irrevocable trusts can sometimes be revoked or changed by the agreement of all parties (including beneficiaries) although that doesn’t work if minors are involved.  Irrevocable trusts that are broken and no longer serve their original purpose can also sometimes be fixed by a process called decanting.  It involves creating a new trust and “decanting” the assets of the first into the second.

If you are using irrevocable trusts you are working with very sophisticated tax and creditor laws, so you’d have to check with your attorney if those options will fit with the trust you are creating.  It is also not something we like to rely on, which is one of the reasons irrevocable trusts are used less.

Speak with an experienced estate planning or probate attorney to see if a revocable or an irrevocable trust is best for you and your goals.

Reference: Yahoo Finance (Sep. 10, 2022) “Revocable vs. Irrevocable Trusts: Which Is Better?”

Continue ReadingRevocable vs. Irrevocable Trusts

Will Making a Gift Conflict with Medicaid?

People usually make gifts for three reasons—because they want to provide for the recipient, because they want to protect assets, or minimize tax liability. However, gifting in one’s elder years can have expensive and unintended consequences, as reported in the article “IRS standards for gifting differ from Medicaid” from The News-Enterprise, especially with Medicaid.

As a quick aside, if you’ve read any of my articles on gifting, you know I preach caution.  Way too many people make gifts because of a perceived benefit, and don’t consult a professional to determine whether there is a benefit.  That said, for the purposes of this article, I’m going to focus on Medicaid gift tax consequences as opposed to all of the other pros and cons in making gifts.

A primary reason for most people to make gifts is tax planning.  The IRS gift tax becomes expensive, if gifts are large. However, each individual has a lifetime gift exemption and, as of this writing, it is $12.06 million, which is historically high. A married couple may make a gift of $24.12 million. Most people don’t get anywhere near these levels. Those who do are advised to do estate and tax planning to protect their assets.

The IRS also allows an annual exemption. For 2022, the annual exemption is $16,000 per person. Anyone can gift up to $16,000 per person and to multiple people, without reducing their lifetime exemption.

However, the more real danger is the effect of a gift on Medicaid or long-term care benefits.  People, and frequently financial advisors and non-attorney professionals, often confuse the IRS annual exclusion with Medicaid requirements for eligibility. IRS gift tax rules are totally different from Medicaid rules.

Medicaid does not offer an annual gift exclusion. Medicaid penalizes any gift made within 60 months before applying to Medicaid, unless there has been a specific exception.  The Veterans Administration may also penalize gifts made within 36 months before applying for certain VA programs based on eligibility.

For Medicaid purposes, gifts include outright gifts to individuals, selling property for less than fair market value, transferring assets to an irrevocable trust, or giving away partial interests.  Some gifts are expressly permitted, such as gifts between spouses.  Also, most states have some species of an exception for very small gifts, but that definition varies widely.

For example, in Texas there is no exception for small gifts.  However, Medicaid staff is instructed not to inquire into potential gift transactions for less than $200 total in a month.  That doesn’t create a strategy of gifting typically, but it avoids Medicaid penalties when Grandma gives $50 to a grandchild for their birthday.

The penalty for gifting in Medicaid is a penalty period.  In short, Medicaid looks at your eligibility, and once otherwise eligible will calculate a penalty period by dividing the value of your gifts by a penalty rate based upon the daily average cost of a nursing home in the year of the gift.  So, if you gave away $50,000 and the penalty rate is $250 per day, you are ineligible for 200 days.  During this time you’ll have to find a way to pay yourself before Medicaid will.

So, gifting where Medicaid may be an issue in the future often has very real and dangerous consequences.  That doesn’t mean gifting can’t be useful in Medicaid, as sometimes gifting is an express strategy for eligibility, but anyone making gifts should do so at the advice of an attorney.

Reference: The News-Enterprise (Aug. 6, 2022) “IRS standards for gifting differ from Medicaid”

Continue ReadingWill Making a Gift Conflict with Medicaid?

Benefits of Life Insurance in Estate Planning

I’ve had a lot of conversations recently with clients about life insurance in their estate plans.  As an estate planner, I like life insurance.  It provides many benefits in estate planning that are worth considering.  So, I wanted to address some benefits of life insurance.

I’m not doing to talk about whether you should get it per se (other advisors are better suited for that and we can recommend excellent ones), and I’m not going to talk about the financial pros and cons, but instead will focus on the role of life insurance in an estate plan and administration.  For more on how insurance works and the pros and cons, you may want to read Bankrate’s recent article entitled “Life insurance for parents” which exams how life insurance can help your family.

Liquidity:Sometimes clients will ask for very detailed estate plans involving several bequests.  The estate plan is truly their legacy, and they want to express their love and appreciation to many people by giving them a gift in their estate planning.  I think that’s wonderful, but it does present a problem if the estate is illiquid.

For example, a client may have a very healthy estate of $3,500,000 and want to leave $100,000 a piece to 7 different relatives.  That’s fine in theory, but where do you get $700,000 in cash?  That client might have a house, a vacation/beach home, retirement and minimal bank accounts.  The 401(k) might have to (or tax wise should) go to his spouse.  If the house is worth $750,000, the beach home $250,000 and the retirement $2,000,000, you don’t have enough cash left over to give $700,000 to the family, unless you start selling.  With life insurance, you have the cash available.

Estate Tax Planning.This is a bit more complicated, but for clients concerned about estate tax, life insurance is a very useful tool.

The first reason why is similar to the liquidity point.  If you know you are going to pay the estate tax, which is a 40% tax rate on the value of the estate which exceeds your exemption, you may have a rather large check to write.  So, having cash at death provides your beneficiaries with a way to pay the tax without having to liquidate assets at death.

Second, it has a low lifetime value, and most of the value comes post death.  So, if you want to leave more money to your beneficiaries while keeping a smaller amount of assets during your lifetime, you may consider using life insurance in an irrevocable trust.  Here is a useful article talking about how life insurance trusts work.

https://galligan-law.com/the-irrevocable-life-insurance-trust-why-should-you-have-one/

Providing for Beneficiaries with Disabilities: Life insurance is a great income replacement tool, which the Bankrate’s article addresses.  In this particular estate planning context, it is an extremely useful tool for planning for beneficiaries with disabilities.  For example, many couples who have a child with disabilities will provide for that child for as long as they are able.  Their lifetime support provides benefits, both tangible and intangible, for their child that government benefits can’t address.  However, that support may go away when you pass.

Now, that situation is often best addressed by leaving assets to that child in a supplement needs trust, but more importantly, the assets you leave have to be liquid as you know they will be used liberally for the care of your loved one.  So, creating a trust to hold the insurance, such as an inexpensive second-to-die policy, allows the cash to be held in a tax and benefits-efficient manner for your loved one.

Simplicity.Life insurance, in its simplest form, is a contract for a company to give cash to a person you named when you die.  That money is income tax free and doesn’t have complicated rules about how to distribute the proceeds.  For comparison, retirement assets like IRA’s and other qualified retirement funds have complicated rules about to whom they pay out, how long those beneficiaries have to take the money and very specific steps to follow to obtain them.  Retirement assets are wonderful of course because tax deferral allows retirement assets to grow tremendously and provide for your retirement, but are taxed to beneficiaries and don’t flow through your estate plan as easily as life insurance proceeds.

Creditor Protection:  This is not true everywhere, but in Texas life insurance has creditor protection.  So, there are situations where an estate or a beneficiary has creditors, but life insurance can be shielded.  You don’t want to rely on that alone for asset protection planning, but is a helpful feature that cash in a bank account lacks.

If you have life insurance and want to discuss its role in your estate plan, please reach out to your estate planning attorney to learn how it can help you.

Reference: Bankrate (July 26, 2022) “Life insurance for parents”

Continue ReadingBenefits of Life Insurance in Estate Planning