People make a grave error when they don’t have an estate plan because they think their surviving spouse is their automatic beneficiary.  The laws of intestacy work differently, as explained in a recent article “Estate Planning: The spouse doesn’t always get everything” from nwi.com.

The surviving spouse doesn’t always receive everything under the intestate laws. This often comes as a surprise to people. In estate administrations without a will, I’m often told the decedent didn’t have a will because “it all goes to the wife anyway” or sometimes even “it all goes to the kids” (but that’s a different blog).

In many states, one half of the decedent’s estate assets are distributed to the spouse and the other half are distributed to the decedent’s child or children.  Similarly, many states have provisions where some property is divided between spouse and decedent’s parents if there are no kids.

To make this a bit more complicated, Texas has community and separate property.  Community property is marital property, and separate property comes from outside of the marriage, such as inheritance from that spouse’s family, a gift or something they distinctly brought to the marriage such as their home.  Separate property is treated differently in intestacy.

If a married couple lives in the separate property residence of a spouse who then dies, the surviving spouse gets a life estate in 1/3 of the property and the children take the rest.  It basically means the spouse stays in the house, but the house ultimately goes to the kids.  This essentially creates a division in which the spouse is expected to pay for some expenses, and the children for the rest.  It tends to be an unhealthy dynamic, to say the least.

Bear in mind the intestate laws only apply to assets in an estate administration.   Assets that pass by contract, such as life insurance to a named beneficiary or an account titled as joint tenants with rights of survivorship pass to those individuals.  This solves part of the property, such as bank accounts, but won’t solve the problem for everything.

I should note too that many people assume everything goes to the spouse because that’s what most people choose in their estate plans.  Practically things do go to spouse, but it required the estate plan to make it happen.  People see the common result and make an assumption on the process.

If you’d prefer to leave more to your spouse, you need a will. Intestacy literally translates to dying without a will. If you have a will and then die, you haven’t died intestate, and the provisions don’t apply.

The key in estate planning is to recognize you have a choice.  If you want everything to go to your spouse, don’t assume it’ll happen. Make it happen in your estate plan.

As one final aside, people also assume spouses can act for them if they are incapacitated.  That also isn’t automatically true and may require guardianship if estate planning doesn’t address it, although a power of attorney may avoid that need.  See here for more:  https://galligan-law.com/do-you-need-power-of-attorney-if-you-have-a-joint-account/

Each state has its own laws of intestacy, so an estate planning attorney who practices in your state needs to be contacted to determine what would happen to your spouse if you didn’t have a will. Your best recommendation is to meet with an experienced estate planning attorney and create a plan to protect your spouse, your children or your chosen beneficiaries.

Reference: nwi.com (Oct. 23, 2022) “Estate Planning: The spouse doesn’t always get everything”